×

Former CIA director calls conflict with Iran ‘war of choice,’ not regime change

By AP via Scripps News Group Apr 3, 2026 | 4:17 AM

Former CIA Director Bill Burns has described the U.S.-Israeli war launched against Iran as a war of choice that may have only further empowered the most hard-line elements within its theocracy.

Burns, a former State Department diplomat, made the observation in a podcast by Foreign Affairs magazine.

This is a regime that is inept at many things like managing its economy, but it is designed to preserve itself and designed to repress its own people and designed to withstand even the decapitation of its senior leadership, said Burns, who secretly negotiated with the Iranians ahead of the 2015 nuclear deal with world powers during the Obama administration.

Burns also disagreed with U.S. President Donald Trumps assessment that there had been a regime change in the airstrike campaign killing top leaders, including Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

RELATED STORY | Here’s how the war in Iran is set to make summer travel more expensive

In some ways, its certainly a much weaker regime, but its also one thats even nastier and more radical and, you know, less open, he said.

He added that Irans theocracy thought victory is survival.

Ive believed for a long time that this is a regime thats on a kind of one-way street to its eventual collapse, but I worry that, you know, in this war, what weve done rather than accelerate that moment of collapse is slow it down a little bit, Burns said.

He noted Trump could try a ground operation to take Irans Kharg Island, its main oil terminal, or territory along the strait, but both carry significant risks.

RELATED STORY | In national address, Trump says Iran war could wrap in weeks

Then theres the third option, which is effectively declaring victory and the inversion of the old Colin Powell Pottery Barn rule, which was we break it, we own it, Burns said, referencing a comment attributed to former U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell before the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

Instead, it would be, we break it, you own it, and its over to you guys, whether its European allies or Gulf Arabs or anybody else to ensure safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz.